Appearance
Trust Framework
The Trust Framework defines how trust is established, maintained, and verified within IOST 3.0's DID ecosystem. It provides the rules, policies, and mechanisms that enable participants to make reliable trust decisions about digital identities and credentials.
Trust Model
IOST 3.0 implements a multi-layered trust model that combines the strengths of decentralized systems with practical governance mechanisms:
Foundational Principles
Decentralized Trust: No single authority controls identity verification
Trust Triangulation: Trust established through multiple independent verification paths
Contextual Trust: Different trust requirements for different use cases
Proportional Trust: Verification strength proportional to risk and value
Transparent Verification: Clear mechanisms for credential verification
Trust Levels
IOST 3.0 defines standardized trust levels that provide a common framework for expressing verification strength:
Level | Name | Description | Typical Use Cases |
---|---|---|---|
0 | Basic | Self-attested information with minimal verification | Social profiles, preferences |
1 | Enhanced | Single-source verification with basic checks | Forum memberships, community access |
2 | Verified | Multi-source verification with strong evidence | Financial services, healthcare |
3 | Certified | Highest level verification including biometric and regulatory compliance | Government services, high-value transactions |
Trust Level Calculation
Trust levels are calculated based on multiple factors:
Identity Proofing Strength: Robustness of the initial verification process
Authentication Factors: Number and strength of authentication methods
Credential Issuer Reputation: Trust score of the credential issuer
Verification Freshness: Recency of verification checks
Compliance Alignment: Adherence to relevant regulatory requirements
Trust Anchors
Trust anchors are entities within the IOST ecosystem that serve as trusted reference points:
Types of Trust Anchors
Institutional Anchors: Established organizations with regulatory credentials
Technical Anchors: Secure systems and infrastructure components
Community Anchors: Entities with high reputation scores in the network
Governance Anchors: IOST foundation and governance members
Trust Anchor Requirements
To qualify as a trust anchor, entities must meet stringent requirements:
Maintain secure key management practices
Submit to regular security audits
Implement transparent verification procedures
Maintain compliance with relevant regulations
Contribute to the overall security of the ecosystem
Credential Verification
IOST 3.0's trust framework defines how verifiable credentials are evaluated and trusted:
Verification Mechanisms
Cryptographic Verification: Mathematical validation of credential signatures
Status Checking: Verification of credential revocation status
Chain of Trust: Validation of the issuer's authority to issue credentials
Biometric Binding: Linking credentials to biometric verification (when applicable)
Cross-Verification: Corroborating credentials across multiple sources
Selective Disclosure & Zero-Knowledge Proofs
The framework supports privacy-preserving verification through:
Minimal Disclosure: Revealing only necessary attributes
Derived Credentials: Proving properties without revealing source data
Range Proofs: Demonstrating values within acceptable ranges
Zero-Knowledge Age Verification: Proving age requirements without revealing birth date
Biometric Trust Enhancement
IOST 3.0 uniquely integrates biometric verification to strengthen the trust framework:
Proof of Heartbeat Protocol
The Proof of Heartbeat protocol provides continuous passive authentication:
Device Binding: Associates wearable devices with DID through secure registration
Biometric Templates: Creates secure, privacy-preserving biometric reference data
Continuous Authentication: Validates user presence through heartbeat patterns
Anti-Spoofing Measures: Detects fraudulent biometric presentations
Privacy Safeguards
To protect biometric data within the trust framework:
Local Processing: Biometric matching occurs on secure hardware
Template Protection: Biometric templates are encrypted and never stored in raw form
Revocable Biometrics: Templates can be revoked and regenerated
Consent Management: Clear user consent mechanisms for biometric processing
Trust Registry
The Trust Registry maintains authoritative information about ecosystem participants:
Registry Components
Issuer Registry: Records about authorized credential issuers
Schema Registry: Standard schemas for different credential types
Revocation Registry: Information about revoked credentials and DIDs
Trust Anchor Directory: Listing of recognized trust anchors
Governance Model
The Trust Registry is governed through:
Distributed Administration: Multiple parties share administrative responsibility
Transparent Policies: Clear rules for inclusion and removal
Audit Trails: Immutable records of registry changes
Community Input: Stakeholder participation in governance decisions
Regulatory Compliance
IOST 3.0's trust framework addresses key regulatory requirements:
Compliance Integration
KYC/AML Alignment: Compatibility with Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering regulations
GDPR Compatibility: Mechanisms for data minimization, right to be forgotten, and data portability
Industry-Specific Standards: Support for financial, healthcare, and other regulated sectors
Cross-Jurisdiction Capabilities: Adaptable trust rules for different regulatory environments
Compliance Verification
The framework enables compliance verification through:
Automated Policy Checking: Programmatic verification of regulatory requirements
Audit Support: Comprehensive logging for compliance audits
Regulatory Reporting: Tools for generating required regulatory reports
Adaptive Compliance: Updating compliance measures as regulations evolve
Dispute Resolution
The trust framework includes mechanisms for resolving identity-related disputes:
Resolution Process
Discovery Phase: Collection and preservation of relevant evidence
Evaluation Phase: Assessment by qualified arbitrators
Resolution Phase: Determination of appropriate remedies
Implementation Phase: Execution of the resolution decision
Remediation Options
Available remedies for trust violations include:
Credential Revocation: Invalidation of compromised credentials
Trust Score Adjustment: Modification of entity trust ratings
Registry Updates: Changes to Trust Registry entries
Compensatory Measures: Restitution for affected parties
Ecosystem Integration
The Trust Framework integrates with the broader IOST 3.0 ecosystem:
Integration Points
RWA Framework: Trust verification for real-world asset tokenization
Payment Infrastructure: Risk-based authentication for financial transactions
Governance Systems: Identity verification for voting and governance participation
Layer 2 Solutions: Scalable trust verification for high-volume applications